Бесплатный фрагмент - Khan

In September 2012, the remains of Richard III, the last of the Plantagenet dynasty, were accidentally discovered in Leicester. He was killed in battle by representatives of the Tudors, another royal branch of Britain. His enemies stripped him, even cut off his feet out of fear. The honorable burial took place three years after the examinations. In the same year, there was a sensation. The local club Leicester became the champion of England for the 2015—2016 seasons. This book is for those in power who held any position or worked in the apparatus.

Many sectarians could say — present: «You complain about the dictatorship of those at the top»

This is not the case.

Yes, I am offering autocratic power. The power of the chosen and worthy. And the scoundrels of officials were recruited up because of the mainstream and liberal misconceptions. While clowns are appointed to rule countries all over the world.

Through so-called democracy weeding out weak people to the top will only accelerate the deep state’s collapse. The collapse of traditional families, your relatives, your meaning of life.

But I haven’t been interested in you for a long time. You only need a layout of a ready-made organization under the name of the state.

Chapter 1

When fathers are afraid of their sons

No matter what nomads do, no matter how they dress, no matter what they are called, they remain nomads even in the most expensive European tailcoats.

Nomads have never been either liberals or Democrats. The nomads had a specific democracy. Instead, this is an extraordinarily infrequent emergency with no real Khan.

But when a real khan appears, the nomads live by an age-old ideology — the father is afraid of the son.

The father is afraid of the son — this is the actual total ideology of the nomads, invisible to the outside eye. Khan is not scared of his entourage. He can execute them, send them to war, defame them, and make the people curse their names. Traitors can die either in battle or by accident.

Khan’s son may also die by accident. For example, from a kulan attack on a hunt. Have you ever heard of hunters being killed by an artiodactyl attack while hunting? Especially if it’s the Khan’s son.

The father is afraid of the son, which means the rulers fear the closest ones. So that they don’t come forward and don’t obscure

the leader so that they don’t get cocky.

For the people, this also means mutual responsibility. In Asia, there is total joint responsibility; there was, there is, and there will be. For now, fathers will be afraid of the audacity of their sons.

Nomads have sons who are not daring from birth. That’s how they’re raised so they don’t disgrace their fathers.

Officials are also brought up in the spirit of fear, no matter how they dress or what modern costumes they wear.

So. That’s why fathers are afraid of their sons.

Chapter 2

The castes

Under a democratic system, parents will not be respected and feared (all under the pretext of freedom!), the migrant will be equalized with the native citizen, and the citizen with the migrant; the same will happen with foreigners.

Plato

Autocracy, the Asian dictatorship, is quite a harmonious political system for former nomads.

The quality of power under an autocracy is another matter. It depends on the personality of the autocrat. This is the Achilles heel of all monarchies. But this does not negate the fact that people have different degrees of suitability for other people’s systems, particularly for democracy.

Conservative systems are fixated on castes. This is mainly due to the tradition of noble families. This implies that even despite education, ordinary people (the rabble) cannot think deeply, abstractly, or nobly. This very crowd, the self-esteem of the masses, and the ambitions of ordinary people are being used with the help of so-called democracy to the detriment of ordinary people themselves, traditional peoples. Of the most stupid, uneducated, and intemperate, they create a new «democratic elite» on the ground, But by the 21st century, approaches must be reconsidered. Moreover, the conditional rabble received carte blanche for the entire 20th century in the form of socialist ideas. Socialism and this is Chinese, North Korea, Vietnamese, and in the former USSR it took root in a strange way in ASIA, where there has always been a monarchy

In the 21st century, these socialist monarchs are going through a crisis, or they are waiting for a crisis like the crisis in the USSR, where a new conservative elite of peasant children has matured and immediately organized their own dictatorship of the oligarchy.

===================================

I give an example of the type of the former nomads for an accurate understanding that not all people are capable of high flight. First, socialism educated everyone; then, democracy unleashed the tongues of such people. Ordinary people usually give their voices in times of extreme need or disaster (famine, war, etc.). When there is no need, they cast their votes in vain.

In this case, Islam came to the aid of the Arabs, the same nomads, and through the Koran, appealed to all people.

This appeal does not require feedback, that is, it is as autocratic as the secular power of the nomads. There can be no other treatment.

Communication with former nomads can only be autocratic, unconditional, and one-sided.

This solves the issue of medieval castes if people lack their understanding.

Chapter 3

Degradation of power on a global scale

«The lack of beauty standards due to which the majority of the world’s population has complexes.»

The law of nature requires that the smart communicate with the smart and the stupid with the crowd. Democracy humiliates the smart in the name of the stupid because the silly will never choose the smart. This briefly explains the reasons for the degradation of the institution of power in recent centuries.

Today, the situation is catastrophic. The pride of the crowd has penetrated all spheres. You ask, how can self-love penetrate into all spheres? Because the average non-ambitious, non-jealous people grew up just on this moderate choice of millions and (even billions nowadays) of their kind who do not cause jealousy and envy. And this choice is called democracy.

Today, the crowd really decides where a genius or a smart guy would get into a dead end of contradictions. From here, horrid girls win the beauty contest, and the jury of experts doesn’t know who to give the Nobel Peace Prize to — Gretta Thunberg or Zelensky. Humanity is at the highest point of degradation. There has never been such a degradation of human values, logic, and reason in the history of mankind. There were only forerunners of such a degradation phenomenon (since the Athenian democracy).

Chapter 4

When humanity has no strategy

«It’s hard to say which form of government is worse, and everyone is so bad. And a democratic one is the worst of all because what is democracy but an aristocracy of scoundrels.»

George Gordon Byron

The totality of the media has led people to become sensation addicts.

Everything that happened in the past, what is happening and what can happen, is washed away, which leads to a loss of reality and the expectation of a new sensation — disaster.

It can be considered that the news feed or the hubbub of the writing and reporting fraternity creates the exchange rate through many psychological threads and the meaning of human life.

News addiction and greed, greed for money through news, have created a worldwide epidemic. This is not Covido. People needed a catastrophic sensation. Covido is a direct consequence of drug addiction. The World Center of Financiers has created the desired news for the periphery and the masses.

Secondary, seemingly third-rate factors indicate the impending turmoil when well-fed and well-dressed people are angry, ambitious, embittered, unyielding, arrogant, envious, and mean. People overlook the elderly; the young do not give way, and the queue is indifferent. When overloading the elevator, young guys ask a girl to come out with a child in her arms. Drivers honk at the tail of the person in front, although he has another car in front. Total indifference. Total irresponsibility of the structures, unsubscribing by blanks. Everyone, not only some officials, is portraying work. Civil servants sit for hours, waiting to run home faster.

The hypocrisy of power and ostentation are not enough to relieve tension. Actually, the «waste» of human material is collected at the top — for natural reasons. They go to power to get rich faster. And how do people give a strategy?

People, what do you want? What are you dreaming about? Do you want more democracy?

Get more anger. Finally, get to the slaughterhouse, as the final catharsis of malice. War is the apotheosis of social malice. It collects everything. Squeezes and spills.

Chapter 5

Don’t let the crooks come forward

Living power is hateful to the rabble; They only know how to love dead rulers.

A.S Pushkin

Every group, community, and person creates an organization to prevent a power struggle. That is, the system and tradition always oppose every conventional upstart.

Thus, the ambitions of princes and feudal lords are always stacked in layers of ritual. No one can escape these conventions, even the most talented and noble prince-pretender. But what happens when someone else’s democracy (someone else’s system) is artificially introduced into such a system, into the conservative-inertial mentality of the people?

The system is immediately disrupted.

Imagine the Macedonian phalanx, the Roman legion, and the Mongolian lava, where the soldiers do not march in formation but push each other. Imagine a caravan where all the camels are mixed up to arrange a rider race. Imagine a hundred sudden prophets riding donkeys to Jerusalem, followed by a crowd of onlookers asking for healing from diseases. There is not only Jesus Christ and not only Caiaphas on the stage. Not one prophet, but a dozen.

There is not a single fixation because the eyes have split.

This is what democracy is in the gloomy environment of an innate culture and an age-old mentality of inertia. There is no way for crooks, crooks, upstarts, no matter what ambitions gnaw at them!

But what will happen if there are too many conservative people (Zerefs), and the elite has disappeared?

Even if there is a formal elite that still bends its knees, hypocritically crosses itself, or calls for building communism. The conservative environment has its periods of degradation when the children of rulers — complete freaks and degraders — must inherit hypocritical rituals and pray not as diligently and truthfully as their poor parents at the time. «Good times give birth to weak people.» But first, the vile rulers. The conservative environment itself is drowning in meanness before its demise. But then democracy comes!

And the rabble finds a voice, which, in theory, should always be quiet and subdued by morality and culture.

The mob begins to struggle for power as if these people had never had any culture, experience, or organization. The system, culture, and tradition held back the ambitions of the princes, even if one of them was the greatest. Tradition restrained not only the ambitions of the nobility but also the excess potential, which could be devastating for the nobility and everyone. Imagine how spiders sit in a jar. They hid each other in his place. They created the system reluctantly. It’s better to stand still than for everyone to die. But what does democracy do?

It adds some aggressive cockroaches to the jar of spiders. And the whole bank goes into an unthinkable infernal movement where no one will survive. From now on, there is no system. There is an out-of-control chaos in a jar with future food for aquarium fish.

Chapter 6

How people kill themselves

Social media is a massive scene. With its help, an amateur, unprofessional crowd is created. An artificial world has been created with a billion artists and almost no audience.

To perform better, amateurs sabotage strong competitors, almost like in real life. Where there were no philosophers, no thinkers, and even just decent people, there were only buffoons, singers, and comedians left. And a billion artists.

No one, mind you, uses violence to create the most unprecedented tyranny in history. So, it is necessary to let all people speak out — express themselves, and they will make a tyranny in which they will be victims. Can be called these people, the people killing themselves with their mass artistry?

Chapter 7

Chaos and degradation technology are controlled

«Many people would like to see and hear what you have heard. But it is not given to them», «I speak to everyone in parables, but I tell you everything»

The Bible

The social network simultaneously creates a billion specialists on all issues: analysts, philosophers, and writers.

Every specialist out of a billion reports his analysis on the air and gets carried away. Therefore, a real philosopher and writer turns into an enemy — hypothetically to the entire billion, not professional writers and analysts. They are offended. They hold a grudge for discrediting their capabilities.

After a while, not only on the web but also in real life, there comes a complete horror. Moreover, the general ugliness is the product of the collective work of this very billion specialists on all issues.

Chapter 8

A new whistle

«If someone calls out to you, don’t twitch. Especially if whistling is the rule. The weak man is filtered by so whistling. Look around, take a break, think. There is no hurry in the camp»

The situation in the Norilsk camp during Stalin’s time

What does HYIP mean? The most successful figures are engaged in HYPE on the official air, on social networks, and in politics. These are the very achievements of democracy in the 21st century, in other words, management technologies from a single center. Downtrodden, clamped, shackled people only suspect that free, in fact, gadgets in the hands of billions are signals that zombies are present at a meeting of controlled chaos. This is how the world’s new rulers have learned to control egoists. Stupid people direct all their anger at their real elite (not at rulers and officials — they are just pawns and self-satisfied money lovers). The crowd doesn’t like intelligent guys and moralists — don’t teach me how to live!

So. The crowd calls out to the whistle. And the new whistle is hype. It is useless for sheep and cows to play Bach and Mozart. Sheep and cows react to noise. Then, after a few seconds, they lower their heads and continue to nibble the grass. That’s how they whistle on social media. That’s how they whistle on the official air. And there are no instruments here, there is no harmony here (instead of bells on the neck, there are fancy gadgets in the hands). There is one total whistle-hype. From this side, someone whistled, bared his ass, showed the cat. Then someone whistled from the other side — sang a song, finished a half-eaten piece of barbecue. The crowd «ran» back and forth with their eyes and ears and forgot. Here it is, freedom!

Chapter 9

Show-offs as human thirst

The mechanism of controlled chaos is based on the ambitions of small people. Any aspiration is power. Little people don’t even understand what they want. But they destroy the system with small urges

When all provincial residents want to be aristocrats, living like aristocrats is a disaster. Provincials can cover their thirst and complexes with patriotism, nationalism, and democracy, but this is just thirst.

Do we want a lot of everything at once?

Yes, we want.

If you put aside the verbal husk, the superficial excitement on the topic of freedom there and democracy, in which speakers and activists do not understand anything about what they are talking about except in a substantive way, then it becomes clearer what really excites fans of the European choice.

This is especially clear against the background of total rudeness from these people.

Those who love show-offs certainly love all modern uprisings.

I’m talking about the local people.

For fans of all sorts of show-offs, the theme of freedom and European choice is attractive, just a favorite. Who in real life is prone to show-offs and kitsch is certainly a fan at the mere mention of Europe. After all, this does not at all reduce the rudeness, rudeness, and ignorance surrounding us. This is even though the streets, that is, panel and brick houses in our country, began to be painted in a rainbow, and private owners’ mansions still compete with each other in height and breadth. That even a car has ceased to be an indicator of coolness. Even if a simple fashion model from a beauty salon can buy a Lend cruiser (and hit a sandbox with children in kindergarten by car, by accident, of course).

And finally, the most important thing.

Our secondary urbanization coincided with other people’s self-determination, on the Maidan. Many visitors from the districts, and then their children, saw an economic and cultural market pogrom, accompanied by a hitherto unprecedented influx of pretty high — quality European things — shortages of all kinds of colors and sizes. So this is also the subconscious solidarity of those who want everything and at once, a lot of recently arrived from our depressed areas and just areas with those who, as it were, have already received it all, overeaten, and gorged themselves in several generations of European bourgeois. But if possible, then without all sorts of wars there and, of course, without bloody dictators. In general, this is a banal consumer shock. And the same bloody shock animal desire.

ps

Why is there a corrupt (thievish) regime? People come from villages and want everything at once. From above and below, everyone wants the same thing. And only a small group, a v

Chapter 10

Social network

According to legend, before his death, Sultan Suleiman called the army’s commander-in-chief and expressed his three wishes to him…

Let the best healers carry my taboo and let everyone see that even the best healers are powerless in the face of death. Scatter the gold I earned, let everyone see that the wealth we receive from this life remains in this world. Let everyone see my hands and learn that even the Padishah of the whole world, Sultan Suleiman Kanuni, left this life empty-handed.

© Fishki.net

Any such parable shows that nothing compares to the great equalizer, death. However, this is all in the past. Circumstances sometimes equalize the rich and the poor, the successful and the loser, the famous and the unwanted. Oh, my God! Social media, the great equalizer today, creates similar circumstances every second.

That’s how the great democracy between the worlds equals the democracy of monkeys when they are invisible and inaccessible on palm trees. This American howl «woooу!» when they like the show — the whole world screams like that anywhere — was brought from Africa by negroes. Before that, migrants: Irish, Germans, Spaniards, especially Jews and Italians had never shouted like that. They just liked the triumph of the chimpanzees on the palm trees when they were throwing a jaguar running and powerless against them from above. The Aborigines noticed it, parodied it by accident, and made the whole of Africa, America, and the whole world scream like that. This is a worldwide «voooу» invented for humans by monkeys. This is the cry of democracy for today. In developed countries, they shout like that everywhere. The whole underdeveloped world is not scared to keep up.

Chapter 11

Asian despotism

The expression Asian despotism has become a household word. Another common expression is «Asiatic,» as a reflection of something wild, uncivilized, not fitting into the bounds of decency or lack of culture. Asiaticism was broadly understood as a rigid autocratic power — Asian despotism. However, despotism was, in fact, everywhere where the European civilizers did not penetrate. And they have penetrated everywhere. Eurocentric cultural values have become a universal measure of all modern values. But in the beginning, the antipode still had to appear. It’s like day and night, light and shadow, good and evil, heaven and hell. Asiaticity, Asia itself, has become an expression of the negative for all world peoples. From now on, all civilized people, the intelligentsia, the nation’s flower, forever sought to resemble Europe. The reference point for Europe has gone even further and has now turned into a reference point for democracy. Everything from the heads of presidents, heads of government, officials, and other small fry, into whose mouth maybe drops of Soros urine are instilled — all these people talk about what they do not know, what they do not know. But they speak very confidently. It can be said that they report brazenly. Autocracy, also by analogy, eastern tyranny, and various dictatorships are pilloried. Once and for all. That’s what Democratic and liberal speakers think. Other chatterboxes, crooks, social networks, and other hype men, of which there are a million — billion today.

No one has yet answered the reason for the Asian despotism. Many big-headed people have tried. Even Karl Marx couldn’t.

They couldn’t. And what do you think?

And I answered simply.

I answered Poincare’s social theorem so simply that I became Kazakh Perelman.

The answer to this millennium puzzle is not only about mathematics. Mathematics is neutral. It is out of politics. Therefore, the eccentric Perelman was easily presented with a Nobel million of money.

What does this gift mean? About Jewish solidarity, most of all. Because this discovery does not give anything, it’s just an essential Jewish message for the whole world. It fits very well into the backbone bonds of world standards for underdeveloped peoples, including those from Asia. Residents from areas of despotism, autocracy, and dictatorship must always look somewhere and wear inferiority complexes. The peoples of the world are complex and looped everywhere.

So. What is the answer? Why despotism is common in Asia. Namely ignorance and cruelty. In Europe, an. d America, democracy, and prosperity are. And there’s less and less time for lying. The moment of the fall of the shore is getting closer.

Chapter 12

The «Great Migration»

Why the Huns staged the «Great Migration»

Since the 4th century, an unprecedented ethno-territorial perturbation has occurred in history. The warlike tribes of the Huns nomads displaced the equally fierce tribes of the German hunters. This bloody substitution of one nation for another was called the Great Migration of Peoples.

What forced the Huns to leave the banks of the Itil (Volga) — to go towards the Danube, no one really knows.

The climate pessimum

Experts say that a cold snap has come. Volcanoes have been revived since the 4th century. The sky darkened. Clouds of smog obscured the earth from the sun. There was a shortage of food in the steppe. People and tribes suffered from famine.

The climatic maximum. Before the 4th century, it was exactly the opposite

The sky was clear. So the sun was shining brightly in the sky. Harvests and livestock offspring inspired people with optimism. So, until the 4th century, a favorable climatic maximum occurred throughout the inhabited world: an abundance of food contributed to population growth.

After the population growth, there was a shortage of food.

This is understandable.

But why the Huns? Why not other nomads, the same Alans, who were «tired of Huns raids.» Were there no more starving nomads in the Great Steppe?

That’s the thing, they were. But it was the Huns who became the «scourge of God.»

Why the Huns were illegitimate

Before the Huns became Guns, the Guns were Huns. And they lived on the Mongolian plateau and lived next to the Celestial Empire.

They lived side by side restlessly. All the time, they inconvenienced the farmers with their raids. It was against them that Emperor Qing Shi Huang built the Great Wall of China. The Chinese wanted to assimilate the nomads culturally at first, but they failed. By the 1st century BC, they got tired of it, and the Han Chinese staged a genocide against the Xiongnu. The most warlike Huns («indomitable» according to Gumilev) fled to the west and reached the interlude of the Don and Volga. For 200 years of such movement, the Huns passed through the lands of the Ugrians, Sarmatians, that is, other lords of the steppes. They did not merge with them but took women from the Ugrians and Sarmatians because they left their Hunnic women in China and Semirechye to break away from the Chinese pursuit. That’s how some of the Sarmatians, pressed by the Huns and the Alans, ended up in the North Caucasus and the Black Sea region. From mixing with the Ugrians and Sarmatians, the Huns began pronouncing the «g» sound from the Alan phonemes. The Ugrians and Sarmatians lost some of their women but survived because they used the same tactics of flight and retreat. In addition, the Alans have not yet built any walls, like the Chinese built the Great Wall of China. It didn’t make the Alans feel any better. Meanwhile, some Alans settled down and began to build watchtowers. Other Alans went west with the Goths (so that the Spaniards would have the region of Catalonia — Goths + Alans, and the French in the 20th-century actor Alain Delon was born).

Let’s assume that the genetics of the «indomitable» Huns are to blame for everything. Wherever they settled, there was no peace for anyone. That’s how the Huns staged the Great Migration of peoples due to the earth’s cooling. The Xiongnu spread their wild energy across the earth. The entropy of this energy has been «shining» for many people for several centuries

Chapter 13

The beautiful spring of democracy

«Let a hundred flowers bloom; let a hundred schools compete»

Mao Zedong

When nature wakes up in the spring, no one is surprised. Flowers appear in the fields. The birds are singing. The nondescript-looking representatives of the fauna are divided into factions.

Unexpectedly, bright characters appear from the general mass of the same type. Against the background of white snow, bright coloring would attract predators. Now, the brighter the better. These are males! Females choose friends with the brightest plumage. This is a guarantee of the health of the future offspring.

What kind of spring makes people wear bright clothes?

Amazing! Expensive branded clothing performs the function of a painted tail.

But this is the case with young people.

And what should middle-aged people do? How can the elderly attract the young?

After all, old people cannot wear torn jeans and highlight bald spots (although such overly youthful characters are increasingly coming across)

«Scars adorn a man»

That’s what they used to say. The time for fights and duels has passed. War is not welcome. And in general, there is no war! All people are for peace. We don’t mind. Scars are no longer decorations. Instead of scars, people wear tattoos

Nothing can decorate a modern man like that, only money!

And to have money, you need to have power.

Americans ask, «If you’re so smart, why not rich?»

This expression is an American cliche for today, too, and does not keep up with events.

It is better to say: «If you are a Democrat member (a variant of a Republican, a member of the Democratic Party), why don’t you have millions?

If you want to be rich, support democracy all over the world — the surest way for today is to not look for pieces of peace all over the planet, that is, where there is no democracy yet, but instead, immediately become a Russophobe.

Therefore, the American cliche about wealth, as an accurate indicator of the mind, is better to immediately philosophy, «If you are a Russophobic, why didn’t you get rich»?

Do you think members of the American Congress need democracy?

Democracy is a reason.

With howling about democracy, interested congressmen, Americans cherish their dreams of wealth in their heads (the Biden clan, Pelosi did it well). With each billion dollars allocated to Ukraine, all participants in the transaction become richer. The allocation of money is a pyramid scheme. The «inventors of help» receive the most. Officials in Ukraine collect crumbs from billions, millions of dollars. Everyone should fight so hard for freedom! Parasites cannot be torn away from this project by any means.

Russia is an outcast country

Why is Russia an outcast?

There is no other country in the world where totalitarianism is a culture, only in Russia. In Russia, people have lived in a collective community for many centuries. Russia is a country of snow and eternal cold. There are a lot of bears in such permafrost. Russia is a country of totalitarian lepers — how else them to protect yourself from bears? Although you can make a fortune in Russia on Putin. That’s why «if you’re a Russophobe, why didn’t you get rich»? The Soros Foundation’s agents, these nobodies dressed up and spoon-fed, could ask precisely the same question. (If they were Americans). These greedy little people from underdeveloped areas are just representatives of philistinism. In the past, beggars. They like never seen anything in your life but want now live beautifully.

Everyone wants to live beautifully.

Birds spread their tails in the spring, so people worldwide look for democracy to wear branded clothes and «live like people.»

Chapter 14

Sweet poison

«A successful businessman will never become a good statesman; his only interest is the pocket, not the people.»

F. Roosevelt

Advertising is the engine of trade… and politics.

The seller praises his product and, at the same time, the buyer. Advertising inflates the product, the manufacturer, and the buyer of the product altogether. If the market trader does not praise the buyer, he will not make a profit. From here, all buyers become like perfection: short ones become tall, full ones become slender, and plain ones become ideal in beauty. That’s where free personalities come from, then just «personalities» who have the right from birth. The origin of the crowd of «personalities» as the sellers’ interest — is it clear to you?

Any conservative society (any society of tradition, traditional society) has clear criteria for social distinction. In other words, traditional society is distinguished by the presence of apparent strata, classes, and castes (the latter two have the most negative connotations). Therefore, any momentary relaxation during the purchase is pleasant in itself. A short, fat, and ugly customer wants to buy more goods and listen to the flattery of the huckster.

So, you don’t have to go to the market, and you don’t have to buy anything else. You can immediately choose your favorite seller as the mayor of the city.

The moment of transition from mass purchases to mass communication «for love» was described by Dale Carnegie. He wrote a training manual for all young buyers. From now on and forever, people try to sell themselves as a commodity with exceptional politeness, services, and silence — when another speaks. Those who are ready to listen and praise have a better chance, as Carnegie recommended to all low, fat, and other moral freaks to be hypocrites and chameleons. Whoever praises you will win!

That’s how playing with petty self-esteem turned into a means of control.

I’ve already told you. Before this tool took shape, people learned to sell and buy everything. The easier, faster, and more profitable it is, the more pleasant it is. Hence, the first mayor of Huckster, as I said.

From the mayor of the merchant to the government of the rootless is not very far either. And this mechanism also has a psychological spring of mass petty selfishness.

The first thing the government of Liberals and Democrats did was anathematize the old regime and state control, ridiculed officials, and conservative values. There is no duty, no service, no morality, no homeland. There is only one goal — pleasure, making a profit, and making a profit to have fun — laissez-faire!

The victory of upstarts and rootless people worldwide testifies to the fertility of all sorts of rabble. In addition, it is about the insidiousness and boundless imagination of the lower classes.

Do you think that with the proclamation of the power of an upstart mayor, a government from the smallest rootless rabble, all conservative values have disappeared?

You will be surprised. This miracle will be for you. Hierarchies do not disappear anywhere, hence classes and castes. And it was precisely because of the general crisis created by every hypocritical liberal creature because of their coveted insatiability, genetic greed (in the first generations anyway) — about it Karl Marx wrote in his Manifesto. The free market of philistines highlights and monstrously emphasizes property inequality. Napoleon himself was fucked up by what the French nouveau riche were doing.

All the nouveau riche creatures, without exception, are engaged in imitation of the aristocracy, but they do it pretentiously wildly.

But they can’t be an aristocracy! Couldn’t. And now they can’t.

And they climb into power solely for personal enrichment. To be praised by voters and hangers-on, as if Refags — their new politicians buys from them (but not the goods, but the votes).

Sellers have always weighed a moral crisis in the crisis of conservative values.

When the old elite got old. When the old elite is overflowing with incompetent descendants of heroes.

Chapter 15

Be a Kazakh

Where does patriotism come from? Where did the motherland come from?

The same question can be asked: where does despotism come from, and where does democracy come from? In other words, you would know what is what when there is an external and internal migration. When mass migration occurs, everything falls into place. Migrants do not need an old homeland. It abandoned them, and these people betrayed their homeland (such mutual contempt). However, you can’t throw the words out of the song. People are often overcome by nostalgia, and successful people are strongly remembered at home. What is broken cannot be glued together. This is not a sentimental foreplay. This is the clarification of the monster. A migrant never knows the word homeland, no matter how often he utters it in public and does not talk about it. Once betrayed, he will betray again. This is mutual hostility, invisible to the eyes of others. No one will ever see this struggle (just as no one will hear the thoughts of an orphan). It is only in the second generation that migrant children pronounce the word love. You can’t force migrant children back to return to the land of their fathers. From that moment on, democracy is born. That is, democracy is the homeland of all emigrant children, even though they have not yet been born until they know it. But when they are born, their parents try very hard to ensure they get a good homeland, that is, that the children have everything — and what is kindness? That is so that the children have property and land. There is no need for any other care. That’s how all the American Aborigines lost their lands.

The Indians, in turn, could pronounce the word homeland, but not because all the owners’ peoples understood this word. The Indians did not have a homeland like the Europeans, but they had a territory where they hunted. They did not have time to call their homeland their homeland, so they had to have an «Asian despotism.» The one in the form of the rarest wild civilizations of the Maya, Incas, and Aztecs, which was pilloried by the conquistadors and their descendants. In the civilizations of the Maya, Incas, and Aztecs, with one eye, everyone would see the causes of despotism. Despotisms, autocracies, and totalitarian systems are typical of the old homeland of migrants (that is, a world without democrats and their descendants). While migrant children are settling in, they are always democrats and bequeath democracy to the future (and then impose it on the whole world, by the way).

Just like that, we playfully answer the greatest mystery of mankind — where Asian despotism and Western democracy come from.

If you want a democratic system, migrate wherever you can, even to the moon. And there, download the rights to local lunatics. If you can’t move far away, then you are a backward person (at the moment, anyway). But all the nomads left on earth, or their descendants, want to build democracy according to European patterns. It’s like if all the Maya, Inca, Aymara, and Iroquois Indians are dressed in tailcoats — none of this will work. There is an inevitable evolutionary line (accumulation of skills, collection of experience) that cannot be jumped over (as one cannot jump over formations, although Marxist Bolsheviks tried to work miracles)

No matter what the nomads build, what they do not declare, or do not glorify, there will still be nomadism, and there will still be autocracy. Of course, it will differ from the Asian wildness, from the «Asiatic» — according to the Europeanized, but it will still be the khan’s prerogative (if we mean the nomadic Turks, then the Kazakhs as well). Nomads do not understand the word homeland by idea. No, of course, according to textbooks, manuals, and the system, all descendants pronounce this word. But these are all words for the air. Millions of nomads can pronounce this word in the chorus but do not understand (in fact, they will breed corruption of unprecedented proportions). For the concept of homeland to float across the sky at this moment, it is not obliged to travel through the historical epochs of European peoples. The people of the owners who had property came up with this word. First, these people settled down and stopped wandering. Therefore, they divided the plots and put up family signs.

However, what is done is done. The nomads had no experience signing land, but they could put tamga (mark) on the ears of cattle and sign new territories with the hooves of their cavalry. Modern nomads no longer need cavalry (the first cruise missile will bring their warlike fervor back to normal). The nomads gained knowledge. Yes, this is someone else’s knowledge. But this is knowledge. Knowledge allows you to control everything, even primitive instincts. First, to prevent nomads from fleeing to the steppe from responsibility (and today to run around the world for show-offs to show relatives: «I’m here in the USA and standing on the banks of the Thames in London!»).

Even the new migration of nomads worldwide does not make them non-nomads. Although in America, in Europe, all Kazakhs shout, «We are for democracy!». They don’t even realize they’re crying. This is a manifestation of their selfishness (and complexes).

Those who shout, «We are for democracy!» have received property in the first generation. They do not suspect themselves that they are calling, «We do not love our wild homeland of nomads» — the very place where the khan’s power should have taken place. But it did not occur, and the nomads are to blame. The current government declares a «desire for democracy,» but it still looks very much like an autocratic (uncultured, uncivilized) by European standards. And that’s right. This is our nomadic government. And do not run away from it in different directions, imitating white people. The white people have long since fled, which cannot be stopped. The end of the world has already been prepared for all nations.

Let’s build from the material that we have. And immediately do without show-offs.

It would be best if you started with work. We need to start with responsibility.

Chapter 16

Happy boors

Why are there many fools and few smart ones?

Because while an intelligent person thinks, fools multiply

So, if you want fascism, force the provincials to flee

The main principle of the right is hierarchy.

The main principle of the left is equality.

Throughout history, people have observed hierarchy, a conservative society that makes up a pyramid of estates. This has not always coincided with justice; in most cases, traditional society looks unfair. But this is an outside view. This is a migrant’s view. The guest will never understand the order in the house, but he can feel the discipline. Maybe a conservative society does not give so much freedom, and the guest will find the air stale and the downcast eyes of the household extinguished. However, discipline is needed to maintain order. Any shift to the left, towards freedom, violates order in every house. First of all, the order of inheritance, literal inheritance, when younger brothers beat up older ones to change the will, literally, when young revolutionaries overthrow old men with the banner of revolution in their hands. But this case is a crisis of conservative morality. Traditional society reproduces quickly; traditional families have many children, and any new invention of technology and officials will face a queue of mothers with hungry children in their arms. The worst answer would be: «You gave birth to them for yourself!» No, they gave birth to them for you! They gave birth to soldiers for you. The time of the long world creates a hidden mobilization; mobilization accelerates after every technical perfection, after every invention.

And to fight with whom?

From this moment, internal migration begins because beggars have nothing to bequeath to their children — heirs without inheritance «attack» cities. Beggars don’t have servants. The revolutionaries are mostly younger. If there are noble teachers for them, they do not follow the queue for ideological reasons. If there are bad guides and no teachers, many impudents turn into loud hypocrites. Even in a so-called democracy, rules are needed. Otherwise, crime will undermine everything (like it does the Latin American mafia; the mafia duplicates the conservative order everywhere). But, as you know, all the «newcomers» and «collective farmers» are orphans and democrats when they meet in the square, first with socialists, then by fascists (or maybe by communists of the Stalinist — Maoist type of communism of the 20th century). Because all visitors have traditional values in their blood (hierarchy and discipline are almost in their genes), they quickly get used to order.

But even in the new column with banners, they feel good. They feel the discipline of their home.

What kind of democracy is this? You are right, and this is not a democracy. Democracy gives millions of Zerefs hope. Who gets registered on the stock exchange, someone who already works at a factory, a company. Someone will be even more lucky — they even buy shares of their companies. At this moment, everyone, not only the visitors, is in a good mood. Prosperity is ahead (that’s what they think)

But these people are vulnerable.

The fascist trend around the world in the 20th century shows only one thing.

The mess in society (country) begins when insignificant people climb up and do not follow the rules. As long as everything is good, as long as there is the first prosperity, they do keep the queue, and it is even profitable to keep the queue. Democracy is an extraordinary society. This is a society of happy boors. But when happiness ends, happy louts quickly turn into fascists. They hate the whole world. All fascists are internal migrants, disappointed at the end of the queue, gentle philistines. New crowds of visitors, looking at them, are also angry, but there is no previous freebie! You can’t live on robbery, theft, and corruption alone. But these are the habits of millions. When bright hopes are dashed, many people begin to draw swastikas on their bodies. There is a systemic queue violation.

The anarchists themselves, who have despised the conservative queue, now want a different order. And they like it if provocateurs call them masters. You are the owners! That’s what they tell people about the gentle construction of civilized orphans. You are a superior race! So you are the owners of this territory. You can skip the queue. These people did not keep the queue at the first prosperity when they got a little rich (and some even a lot). They liked to live with the looting of the state by officials — the same upstarts. Now they are told you are the owners; who wouldn’t like it? Upstart officials can’t think of anything else. They will attempt. But they will turn out to be the mafia again. Hence, there is rapid nationalism, the combat flying squads, and field commanders.

Do you know why warlords seized power in Libya after Muammar Gaddafi Khan?

Because the Zerefs men lack organization, they are all nomadic anarchists. In such a conservative world devoid of order, order is restored. Nomadic anarchists love democracy, they like not to keep the queue when there is no father, when no one is watching. When there is a father, and there are relatives, there will be no democracy.

Democracy is a time of immoralism. Now, I think you are convinced: people who are not adapted to live without order, who do not have the consciousness «this is mine, and this is yours,» love democracy, quickly turn into democrats. And then they are afraid of her. In a democracy, they like the first freebie, the first sip of freedom (all highlanders and nomads behave untied for the first time in the city). But they quickly gather in a bunch at the first danger. And again, they recognize the seniority.

These are just the latest data, the latest facts of our days. Why is Europe the birthplace of old fascism? Because fascism is the quick order of all internal migrants. Europe was the first to lose its kinship. It was in Europe that everything got mixed up — the concept of a nation took place.

Chapter 17

Only a socialist Khan can

The trouble is with your officials. They put my funds for modernization, wages, and solving environmental problems in their pockets. The greed of your compatriots killed the miners. Watching their behavior, I was always amazed. How can you hate your people so much?! As long as you have such leaders, the victims will multiply

Lakshmi Mittal

It is not surprising that such officials live according to the feudal principle of the Middle Ages — I will be the first, but I will never be the second. While there is an opportunity, you need to honor yourself with money. And people will respect me not for my principles and honesty but for my money and opportunities.

Democracy is a state, a system, a regime, a society created by migrants.

The more migrants there are, the more democracy there is. It’s a long migration. In this sense, Americans are out of competition. What else could people without roots who fled Europe have built?

If there are half of the migrants and this half is active because of hunger and injustice, these are internal migrants. Thanks to internal migration due to modernization in the 20th century, Europeans gave the world such fresh ideologies of «short migration» — fascism and communism. If you want to look closer, you will find a solid landless peasantry among the migrants. At the very least, the provincials. And the leaders of the Communists and fascists are the children of provincial officials — this is the rule.

Moreover, quite accurately, the Zeremids (short migrants) choose fascism if private property has been cultivated among the people for several centuries and communism if private owners, as people, were not in honor (like Russia). All the countries of Western Europe were ahead of the whole world in democracy and then the inevitable fascism. Right-wing autocratic regimes, not unlike dictatorships, have been established in all countries of Eastern Europe. But these were obviously conservative countries. England and France went through bourgeois revolutions; the populations mixed up with each other so much that the population had only one cult left: money (It turns out that England and France turned out to have an ornate path towards long migration. In addition, the conflict with Russia in the 21st century shows that Germany and France are more like American colonies. This is the result of their defeat in 1945 and the occupation of these countries. Due to the defeat in World War II, Japan was also occupied. Therefore, Japan also has a developed democracy, although the Japanese have not really mixed with their neighbors. This means that the cult of money can be controlled even by deeply traditional peoples if the people no longer have a traditional elite or it is represented purely symbolically).

This means that countries and societies with strong traditions could avoid fascism, at least not march to the beat of drums in their squares.

But what is needed for a modern democracy?

When we know that democracy can be inspired not only by military bases and Soros funds but also by monetary funds can inspire democracy if the local people consist entirely of Philistines where the ancestral aristocracy does not represent the current elite. Suppose the current elite is recruited not for high morals, professionalism, or responsibility but for unscrupulousness. However, in the Asian tradition, silence, servility, and helpfulness were not called evil in any way. It’s just that many conservative nations have not cultivated a sufficient layer of intelligentsia. The intelligentsia, the children of the intelligentsia, have principles. For all others, the substitute for principles is either idealism or greed. Democracy panders to the very bottom in this sense. Democracy is a system of migrants. It creates migrants, literal and mental, who in their hearts want to migrate. In this sense, the lowest try to trade anything just to get into the stream of democracy — to migrate, to leave the village where everyone saw them as poor. They get into the stream so that they get rich unscrupulously, brazenly, and cruelly. Unscrupulously, greedily, cruelly profiting from his people.

Who are their officials?

Asians or intellectuals? Are they moral or ideological? Suppose the entire elite layer of officials is recruited from the very bottom «for help» in creating a dictatorship of money. In that case, all these people will build themselves mansions, buy expensive cars, engage in ostentation, save money offshore, migrate, and buy housing on islands in the ocean. This is what democracy turns out to be, where there are neither morals nor intelligence.

Everyone here is poor. And they want to show everyone how rich they are. All the officials want to show how rich they are! These are primitive instincts. These are not American migrants at all. These are not any «short» European peasants. These are just new nomads. And among the nomads, the Khan, an outstanding leader, was creating the state. Only the khan can stop the bacchanalia of beggars who want to show themselves but cannot anybody convinced. Besides, only if Khan is a socialist. So, the socialist Khan creates principles, an idea, and a new tradition. Without any of the list of concepts, nothing will work.

Chapter 18

Why did the Kazakhs dislike the cat

Democracy is a system for migrants, for people without roots, to build a hierarchy on a new basis — on the basis of money.

Nomads are migrants, too, of course. But the nomads never had property. Besides, they were moving constantly, so they didn’t seem to care, like, well, who are you — we’re all equal. In fact, nomads are not democrats at all, and they know their place from birth. For the nomads to turn into democrats, all the steppe outcasts should gather in one place — then all the nomads would be Democrats in the Western manner. And then it’s not a constant movement. Nomads always have a place to rest while cattle graze around. These are the most abundant meadows. Disputes between the clans could arise over these places. But each family knew its route and did not cross paths with others. If it is a constant movement, then it is a relative constant. If it’s a life on the road, it’s a very stalled life. This slowness does not allow you to forget who is who and refreshes your memory if someone has forgotten and drunk a lot of fermented mare’s milk.

It seems impossible to have yourself in such a state, except for the nobility and elders. Therefore, the nomads have no principles but the power of words. Taking a place in the family hierarchy, everyone catches up with the owner of indescribable Kazakh ambitions. It can be said that nomads could compete in the pride of posture with each other if they could take off their robes. But one confident pose is enough; one can present arrogance, an expensive robe, a few words confirming his rightness, so that any conditional weak opponent — with a slightly crooked posture, barely noticeably uneven — still bends and concedes an invisible stranger to the lists. There seemed to be a dispute between the Kazakhs, but no one noticed. Any inconspicuous detail, maybe his robe is cheaper, maybe his boots creak or squeeze, perhaps he has nothing to say in response. But everything that is there must be in plain sight. It seems that appearance bothers all people: appearance is obliged to tell more about a person than he speaks. How he says and what kind of posture he will have depends on the robe (how many horses, how many sheep, the herd size). «I carry with me all that I have». It could be called imitating the ancient Greek (a modern meme on this subject, a Kazakh without show — offs is a loser. What kind of principles are Kazakh ambitions? Uh, who are you (Sen Kimsin?) — this is usually such a question to settle down any impudent person who has forgotten his place as an upstart. In this sense, any intellectual, a passing example of a petty bourgeois and a descendant of a fugitive European, could trump only with his knowledge. Kazakhs do not need knowledge. They have not been honored in the past. No amount of knowledge will help a modern upstart, either. In the past, a Kazakh had to know his place: to name his family, his father’s name, and only if they considered him worthy of a conversation and an invitation — who his ancestors were by name and what they did. Kazakhs do conduct side discussions about the weather or fashion, as if they do not keep any unnecessary cats in their portable housing. If this is a relative, at the beginning, they will ask how the health of that one is, how he feels, if he is ill, how he looks; they say last time he was cheerful and healthy — give him greetings from us. Nomads are also interested in the weather, but it is not attractive for walking or love meetings in the open air, but only for the «well-being» of feeding livestock. These are the Kazakh principles of life.

If they are reinterpreted in the European manner, then there is no state here (or any other ideology other than kinship and neighborhood with other people). Kazakhs, even modern ones, are not interested in an abstract state. Kazakhs respect witnesses. It is almost the same as the weather in the past: it is interesting purely for applied purposes. The state is fascinating for surprising relatives and friends, for example. To make the posture straight again, they look confident and arrogant (this phenomenon of straightening posture and the appearance of a voice can be traced to modern officials. Usually, officials recruit a contingent that is not quite suitable, frankly speaking, for management. It can be said that it is not suitable at all, but calm, quiet, unquestioning, humble. The first local boss knows that after a while, the neophyte will have everything: a lot of money and a lot of opportunities, which means expensive clothes and a commanding voice. The most important boss -an autocrat among them can cheer up a newcomer, a regional akim: «You’ll be fine soon. Be patient a little bit.» What does he mean by that? Of course, material well-being. After all, it is the officials who are the richest here.

That is, to add knowledge to ambitions and status, in addition to the father’s name, for example, the conditions are not ripe for this.

Kazakhs still value professionals little, but officials, that is, people with opportunities, love, adore, and at least publicly show it in every possible way as if all the officials’ fathers were noble, rich, and worthy. But this is not the case. Therefore, all officials do not waste time in vain — as long as there is time, while they hold office, they multiply their authority. And there is also little talk about the weather at the parties. They are mostly bragging. And among themselves, they talk about the case in a narrow circle. And the state is here again like some cat. And Kazakhs have never kept cats.

We can say that Western migrant Democrats also talk about the case first. Before the case, they show each other white teeth — signals. In addition to dental services (these services are expensive in the West), they also show expensive watches and, of course, suits by themselves. These descendants of European burghers are most likely (although our burghers are no different) Americans who don’t seem to care at all. Some rich people literally wear rags — a family habit. Carelessness has not disappeared anywhere, but dress codes are still mandatory for them. It’s sacred.

They also have a lot of respect for professionals, in the sense that they could bring them money.

And money is a deity for all migrants.

For nomads, money also coming out on top.

But still.

For a proud Kazakh posture, money alone is not enough. They want something else. Although Kazakhs are nomadic migrants, money has never made the weather for nomads. Only nobility! Therefore, all rich Kazakhs are concerned, literally, about their past. The money came to them for a reason, but after a centuries-old struggle of their ancestors (it seems, the current officials fought like their ancestors also), There is also an ideological device. When the Kazakhs were taken all together in the form of a selected nation, we all fought to have new, famous Kazakhs reign over us. Conservative people have always been very imaginative. But knowledge has also been added here. In the name of what? To justify the new wealth of the new nobility.

That is, we nomads have jumped over everything and everyone again.

These Western migrants, to turn into Democrats, first had property. That is, their ancestors landed on the ground. These ancestors didn’t work out. They didn’t bequeath a name. They didn’t make any money. So the descendants fled to America. And there, they began to compete with money. If you’re so bright, why not be rich?

What have we done?

Why are we embarrassed to repeat after the Americans in our way? If we are so smart, why not the Akims of the regions?

Because we don’t really like money in the depths of the Kazakh (teren halyk) soul. The mind and principles are not necessary for a modern Kazakh career at all. And the state has nothing to do with it. And there is no state without principled people (and cat lovers).

So.

We immediately switched to money. And famous ancestors were invented. It’s not complicated. We love tall tales.

Chapter 19

The whipDo we only love Khan? We love strength

There is no ideology in attacking neighbors. This is a banal robbery (barymta. Idealism was invented by French enlighteners somewhere in the 18th century. However, the ideology can include religious warriors, the Reformation, and the Crusades. Also, the moral and ethical principles of the Roman Stoics and Republicans. The nomads did not have anything like this. Nomads have always fought for leaders. Tribe with tribe, an alliance of tribes with another horde, Genghisids with Genghisids, tsarevichs with tsarevichs. There was no idealism in the European style). The leader led to the seizure of foreign lands or organized resistance. Both attack and defense had the leader’s name, and then the prominent tribe was called, on which the elite relied. All the back-and-forth movements are linked by the name of the leader.

There was nothing nameless. Consequently, all nomadic principles, if this blood connection with the leader can also be called principles after idealism, are tied to the leaders. Hence, no European bonds between nomads and former nomads are valid. You can imitate European stoics, reformers, enlighteners, socialists, democrats, and progressives as much as you like, but personal devotion comes out anyway. But first of all, hypocrisy and ostentation. Ostentation and hypocrisy due to feelings of inferiority and complexes. Everyone understands and feels this is not what is happening; something unreal is happening. But they can’t do anything. And they smile in a defiantly disgusting way, imitating the Americans. They try to smile officially at diplomatic events. At the same time, ordinary people can walk and move around completely sullenly, not smiling at all, competing with each other who will buy something more expensive before rudely ripping off their kind (robbery in a democracy has received an ideology everywhere called business. And the rougher the people, the harsher the robbery. Due to adherents’ cultural carelessness and unwillingness, business can cover the entire society from the bottom up. Even such an elite can show you how to rob. If kindred feelings are more potent than civilians, you can deny everyone because no one will say anything anyway. There will be fewer and fewer literate people and more and more corrupt businessmen. There will come a time when you can point a finger at anyone and say — you are a businessman. He will respond in response: «Yes, I’m a businessman.» That’s how imitation of someone else’s experience, someone else’s culture based on local culture, goes sideways. It’s like pouring low-octane gasoline into a technological mechanism. (Or how in Melanesia the aborigines made airplanes out of straw).

What is missing here? And what do I want to say?

There is an evolutionary line. Darwin was the first to introduce the evolution of species. It takes time for something to come out of the dark, sometimes millions, at least several thousand years.

But man is a smart creature. Easily retrained. Adapts quickly. Easily picks up other people’s skills (if they can be useful. During the Meiji period, the Japanese assembled a replica of a Russian ship with a steam boiler that accidentally sank off the coast of Japan in a year. The Japanese are generally the real champions of the 20th century in modernization. However, in the 21st century, for some reason, after the last breakthrough, they fell into «apathy», stagnation for 30 years).

There are two ways to upgrade. By themselves or through the «occupiers»

It will be a little more difficult and insulting for ourselves. Modernization will require its super dictator. Especially if the people have long since lost their elite, they are ruled all the time by disciples and imitators of other nations. (The fact is that the «occupiers» do not select all their friends and interpreters into the squad. They choose the most diligent. So that they would then be completely devoted to the occupiers; therefore, they gather people from the very bottom into a new elite: those who have nothing will have everything, both money and authority, and will be obliged to the «occupiers.» This case does not exclude the fact that such candidates, when they are ripe for management, will not rob. For such people, they need control all the time. Suppose they stop being afraid and start governing. In that case, they will have a lot of self-will, as if they belonged to a noble family, so two clearly defined qualities can appear at once: the love of power and the insatiability of commoners.

Any conservative elite is formed from heroes. In any case, from the well-off strata. So that hunger and need do not become entrenched in the character. This usually sprouts into ambition. Every prince, a ruling family member, is very proud and arrogant. The aforementioned posture alone is enough (although any suddenly rich Kazakh immediately «baisiit» — he behaves provocatively, — that is, behaves as if he had always been like that)

This pose, a proud posture, a headset high and pushed back a little, an overturned head, and a lifted chin) of course, it also does not fit with European principles (when a knowledgeable intellectual, a professional is confident in himself, that is, in his knowledge)

Principles are born only in one place.

When the man stood up, he rested, and they say it’s about stubborn people.

Indeed, all principled people are stubborn. Instead of family land and property, they have their own opinion.